1 00:00:05,900 --> 00:00:03,320 I want to start with the three laws of 2 00:00:07,789 --> 00:00:05,910 thermodynamics I am aware that there are 3 00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:07,799 actually four laws but I'm going to 4 00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:11,090 ignore the zeroth law and talk about the 5 00:00:17,810 --> 00:00:14,130 traditional three and then I'm going to 6 00:00:22,599 --> 00:00:17,820 talk about how thermodynamics just 7 00:00:25,269 --> 00:00:22,609 doesn't work so let's get on with it 8 00:00:28,670 --> 00:00:25,279 the pesimistic laws of thermodynamics 9 00:00:30,439 --> 00:00:28,680 this was put to me by my original mentor 10 00:00:33,110 --> 00:00:30,449 in physical chemistry way back in the 11 00:00:36,500 --> 00:00:33,120 early 70s and here's the way he put it 12 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:36,510 the first law you can never win 13 00:00:43,369 --> 00:00:40,530 you can only break even pessimistic the 14 00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:43,379 second law you can only break even it 15 00:00:51,860 --> 00:00:48,090 asks through zero hmm the third law you 16 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:51,870 can never get to absolute zero so 17 00:00:56,389 --> 00:00:54,090 thermodynamics is inherently pessimistic 18 00:00:59,619 --> 00:00:56,399 it says give up before you start you're 19 00:01:02,119 --> 00:00:59,629 never going to get there the first 20 00:01:05,570 --> 00:01:02,129 statement is actually a statement of 21 00:01:07,190 --> 00:01:05,580 conservation of energy this began the 22 00:01:10,100 --> 00:01:07,200 history the history of thermodynamics 23 00:01:12,050 --> 00:01:10,110 began with steam engines heat engines 24 00:01:16,609 --> 00:01:12,060 trying to understand them trying to make 25 00:01:19,310 --> 00:01:16,619 them more efficient this first law was 26 00:01:21,109 --> 00:01:19,320 derived to describe heat engines but it 27 00:01:24,770 --> 00:01:21,119 was quickly generalized to other areas 28 00:01:28,460 --> 00:01:24,780 of science and over the intervening 29 00:01:30,980 --> 00:01:28,470 decades even centuries it has become a 30 00:01:33,740 --> 00:01:30,990 bedrock foundational concept that is 31 00:01:37,730 --> 00:01:33,750 never challenged however when you get 32 00:01:40,390 --> 00:01:37,740 into physics more deeply you find that 33 00:01:43,609 --> 00:01:40,400 there's some intrigue behind this 34 00:01:45,469 --> 00:01:43,619 conservation principle first of all 35 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:45,479 let's state the conservation principle 36 00:01:50,030 --> 00:01:47,970 explicitly energy may be transformed 37 00:01:52,700 --> 00:01:50,040 from one kind to another but it cannot 38 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:52,710 be created or destroyed the total energy 39 00:01:59,690 --> 00:01:55,890 is constant co e conservation of energy 40 00:02:02,060 --> 00:01:59,700 is my abbreviation for it this principle 41 00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:02,070 is most clearly true in what are called 42 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:05,490 adiabatic systems that is artificially 43 00:02:10,729 --> 00:02:07,890 constructive systems in which no energy 44 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:10,739 or matter can enter or leave the system 45 00:02:15,970 --> 00:02:13,970 in these systems we can experiment 46 00:02:18,100 --> 00:02:15,980 determined that indeed energy is 47 00:02:21,510 --> 00:02:18,110 conserved and these systems are called 48 00:02:26,610 --> 00:02:21,520 closed systems I want to emphasize 49 00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:26,620 closed systems generally when we 50 00:02:31,870 --> 00:02:28,850 generalized this principle to the entire 51 00:02:35,260 --> 00:02:31,880 realm of science and the universe we 52 00:02:37,270 --> 00:02:35,270 consider it to be true where the entire 53 00:02:39,940 --> 00:02:37,280 universe is considered to be a closed 54 00:02:46,180 --> 00:02:39,950 system that's another key concept that 55 00:02:48,190 --> 00:02:46,190 I'm going to try to destroy the great 56 00:02:49,810 --> 00:02:48,200 physicist Richard Fineman one of the 57 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:49,820 greatest physicists of the 20th century 58 00:02:54,310 --> 00:02:52,010 had this to say about the law of 59 00:02:57,699 --> 00:02:54,320 conservation of energy there is a fact 60 00:03:00,210 --> 00:02:57,709 if you wish a law governing all natural 61 00:03:03,340 --> 00:03:00,220 phenomena that are known to date 62 00:03:05,590 --> 00:03:03,350 note that qualification that are known 63 00:03:07,660 --> 00:03:05,600 to date the law is called the 64 00:03:09,970 --> 00:03:07,670 conservation of energy that is a most 65 00:03:12,190 --> 00:03:09,980 abstract idea because it is a 66 00:03:14,470 --> 00:03:12,200 mathematical principle it says that 67 00:03:17,170 --> 00:03:14,480 there is a numerical quality quantity 68 00:03:18,850 --> 00:03:17,180 sorry which does not change when 69 00:03:20,979 --> 00:03:18,860 something happens it is not a 70 00:03:24,310 --> 00:03:20,989 description of a mechanism or anything 71 00:03:26,590 --> 00:03:24,320 concrete it is just a strange fact that 72 00:03:28,449 --> 00:03:26,600 we can calculate some number and when we 73 00:03:31,449 --> 00:03:28,459 finish watching nature go through her 74 00:03:35,250 --> 00:03:31,459 tricks and calculate the number again it 75 00:03:37,420 --> 00:03:35,260 is the same so final and considers 76 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:37,430 conservation of energy to be very 77 00:03:43,930 --> 00:03:40,570 abstract and very strange 78 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:43,940 well since I'm now entering philosophy 79 00:03:49,300 --> 00:03:46,730 as my third field I need to quote a 80 00:03:54,660 --> 00:03:49,310 couple of philosophers philosophers of 81 00:03:57,460 --> 00:03:54,670 science start with dr. Karl Popper he is 82 00:04:00,880 --> 00:03:57,470 the biggest proponent of a concept 83 00:04:03,310 --> 00:04:00,890 called falsifiability he insisted that a 84 00:04:06,370 --> 00:04:03,320 theory is not scientific unless it is 85 00:04:09,759 --> 00:04:06,380 falsifiable one of the most horrid words 86 00:04:12,430 --> 00:04:09,769 I've ever run across in my entire life 87 00:04:16,840 --> 00:04:12,440 what it means is not what it says but 88 00:04:20,500 --> 00:04:16,850 rather a theory is falsifiable if it is 89 00:04:22,029 --> 00:04:20,510 at least conceivable that an experiment 90 00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:22,039 can be designed that would have the 91 00:04:27,490 --> 00:04:24,289 potential to demonstrate that the theory 92 00:04:27,750 --> 00:04:27,500 is false not that the theory is actually 93 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:27,760 for 94 00:04:38,430 --> 00:04:34,570 the word would suggest well another 95 00:04:41,580 --> 00:04:38,440 philosopher of science dr. James ladyman 96 00:04:44,300 --> 00:04:41,590 which is one of the great names in all 97 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:44,310 of science and philosophy and history 98 00:04:49,950 --> 00:04:47,650 dr. lady Mann says quote some 99 00:04:52,110 --> 00:04:49,960 unfalsifiable principles may nonetheless 100 00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:52,120 be rightly considered part of scientific 101 00:04:56,730 --> 00:04:54,730 knowledge it is inconceivable to most 102 00:04:59,370 --> 00:04:56,740 scientists that an experiment could 103 00:05:02,280 --> 00:04:59,380 falsify it meaning conservation of 104 00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:02,290 energy and apparent violation would 105 00:05:08,310 --> 00:05:05,530 reveal instead that something is wrong 106 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:08,320 with the rest of science in other words 107 00:05:11,700 --> 00:05:09,730 scientists won't question the 108 00:05:15,810 --> 00:05:11,710 conservation principle they'll go look 109 00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:15,820 for something other than it to fix so 110 00:05:19,980 --> 00:05:18,130 that they can save the principle well 111 00:05:23,070 --> 00:05:19,990 I'm here today to destroy the principle 112 00:05:24,300 --> 00:05:23,080 so I guess I'm going to be claiming that 113 00:05:25,050 --> 00:05:24,310 there's something wrong with the rest of 114 00:05:31,850 --> 00:05:25,060 science 115 00:05:37,230 --> 00:05:31,860 according to dr. ladyman so I want to 116 00:05:40,260 --> 00:05:37,240 use a dirty term string theory I already 117 00:05:44,310 --> 00:05:40,270 know that Henry Bower and your goblins 118 00:05:46,770 --> 00:05:44,320 are not fans of string theory it is in 119 00:05:48,390 --> 00:05:46,780 fact very controversial it's not really 120 00:05:51,420 --> 00:05:48,400 recent it has a history that goes back 121 00:05:53,670 --> 00:05:51,430 at least to the 70s but it has only 122 00:05:56,420 --> 00:05:53,680 become popular famous 123 00:05:59,910 --> 00:05:56,430 really in the last couple of decades 124 00:06:02,100 --> 00:05:59,920 string theory proposes that the most 125 00:06:05,370 --> 00:06:02,110 fundamental entity in the universe is 126 00:06:09,750 --> 00:06:05,380 energy and that it's manifested in two 127 00:06:12,990 --> 00:06:09,760 forms the closed loop string and the 128 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:13,000 open-ended string notice the closed loop 129 00:06:16,620 --> 00:06:14,770 string is self-contained 130 00:06:19,230 --> 00:06:16,630 but the open-ended string has a couple 131 00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:19,240 of ends a couple of loose ends that need 132 00:06:28,110 --> 00:06:23,530 to be tied up so string theory proposes 133 00:06:31,460 --> 00:06:28,120 that open strings are tied up by being 134 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:31,470 attached to what's called a D brane and 135 00:06:40,390 --> 00:06:38,770 this is a we use my red pointer can you 136 00:06:43,870 --> 00:06:40,400 see the red 137 00:06:46,930 --> 00:06:43,880 the red on red here is the d-brane 138 00:06:50,170 --> 00:06:46,940 that's reduced to two dimensions from 139 00:06:53,980 --> 00:06:50,180 four dimensions three spatial and one 140 00:06:59,189 --> 00:06:53,990 temporal dimension and an open string 141 00:07:01,450 --> 00:06:59,199 must be affixed by at least one end to a 142 00:07:03,460 --> 00:07:01,460 space-time in this case a 143 00:07:05,710 --> 00:07:03,470 four-dimensional space-time whereas a 144 00:07:07,689 --> 00:07:05,720 closed string needs no such attachment 145 00:07:12,610 --> 00:07:07,699 in fact it cannot form any such 146 00:07:16,390 --> 00:07:12,620 attachment and so we have a situation 147 00:07:18,610 --> 00:07:16,400 where one is constrained that is open 148 00:07:21,879 --> 00:07:18,620 strings are constrained by being fixed 149 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:21,889 in a space-time whereas closed strings 150 00:07:26,290 --> 00:07:24,650 are free they're free agents they're 151 00:07:28,950 --> 00:07:26,300 free floating they can go anywhere they 152 00:07:31,270 --> 00:07:28,960 can be in a four-dimensional space-time 153 00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:31,280 but they can also leave it they're not 154 00:07:36,490 --> 00:07:33,770 attached to it that means first of all 155 00:07:39,460 --> 00:07:36,500 that closed loop strings do have the 156 00:07:42,790 --> 00:07:39,470 exclusionary property of matter what 157 00:07:45,219 --> 00:07:42,800 philosophers called extension closed 158 00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:45,229 loop strings do not have extension they 159 00:07:50,490 --> 00:07:47,690 do not occupy space in an exclusionary 160 00:07:52,750 --> 00:07:50,500 manner although they can exist within 161 00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:52,760 four-dimensional space they are not 162 00:07:59,200 --> 00:07:55,250 excluding other objects from that same 163 00:08:00,659 --> 00:07:59,210 space so to speak so string theory says 164 00:08:03,149 --> 00:08:00,669 that these are the two basic components 165 00:08:06,520 --> 00:08:03,159 from which everything else is 166 00:08:08,500 --> 00:08:06,530 constructed now again I will say string 167 00:08:10,659 --> 00:08:08,510 theory is controversial it has not been 168 00:08:12,730 --> 00:08:10,669 proven some scientists believe it's 169 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:12,740 unprovable and therefore not scientific 170 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:14,930 that is the Pape area in view that's 171 00:08:20,909 --> 00:08:17,930 unfalsifiable so it's not science I'm 172 00:08:22,180 --> 00:08:20,919 going to argue that in fact it is 173 00:08:25,060 --> 00:08:22,190 falsifiable 174 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:25,070 and it has not been falsified due to 175 00:08:34,300 --> 00:08:28,250 billions of experiments pretty 176 00:08:36,940 --> 00:08:34,310 outrageous closed strings should be able 177 00:08:39,339 --> 00:08:36,950 to form entities by interacting with 178 00:08:42,100 --> 00:08:39,349 each other just as open strings do 179 00:08:42,990 --> 00:08:42,110 there's no opry reason why this is 180 00:08:46,449 --> 00:08:43,000 impossible 181 00:08:49,269 --> 00:08:46,459 so is it possible to conceive of a 182 00:08:53,250 --> 00:08:49,279 closed string body a closed string 183 00:08:55,200 --> 00:08:53,260 entity I'm going to suggest to you the 184 00:08:59,730 --> 00:08:55,210 you're looking at right now is a picture 185 00:09:02,400 --> 00:08:59,740 of a closed string entity or body and no 186 00:09:04,440 --> 00:09:02,410 not the entire closet that you see there 187 00:09:08,790 --> 00:09:04,450 I'm gonna have to point out the entity 188 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:08,800 to you it's a little hard to see but 189 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:12,970 it's right there do you see it this is 190 00:09:21,690 --> 00:09:15,130 what is called in parapsychological 191 00:09:23,400 --> 00:09:21,700 circles and orb and at past SSE 192 00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:23,410 conferences when I've mentioned orbs to 193 00:09:26,790 --> 00:09:25,210 people they've pulled out their laptops 194 00:09:29,610 --> 00:09:26,800 and shown me their collections of 195 00:09:31,670 --> 00:09:29,620 pictures of orbs and I'm like well 196 00:09:34,140 --> 00:09:31,680 you're way ahead of me on the orb front 197 00:09:36,420 --> 00:09:34,150 this is the only picture I have of an 198 00:09:38,970 --> 00:09:36,430 orb and this was given to me by a friend 199 00:09:42,090 --> 00:09:38,980 who was a ghost hunter at a part-time 200 00:09:44,070 --> 00:09:42,100 amateur ghost hunter she was 201 00:09:48,450 --> 00:09:44,080 investigating her mother's basement and 202 00:09:50,790 --> 00:09:48,460 she announced to no one in particular if 203 00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:50,800 there is anyone here who would like to 204 00:09:56,130 --> 00:09:53,890 reveal themselves please do so now and 205 00:09:59,520 --> 00:09:56,140 she took three consecutive digital 206 00:10:03,450 --> 00:09:59,530 frames the first and third revealed only 207 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:03,460 the closet the middle one showed this 208 00:10:11,490 --> 00:10:08,290 white entity in the frame so it showed 209 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:11,500 up at her request and it disappeared it 210 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:13,050 didn't come from anywhere 211 00:10:17,520 --> 00:10:15,370 apparently and it didn't go anywhere 212 00:10:21,180 --> 00:10:17,530 apparently it just popped into this 213 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:21,190 reality and popped out this I'm going to 214 00:10:28,590 --> 00:10:23,890 suggest to you is a closed loop string 215 00:10:31,110 --> 00:10:28,600 entity otherwise known as a ghost also 216 00:10:36,780 --> 00:10:31,120 otherwise known as a disembodied human 217 00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:36,790 spirit so I'm suggesting that we as 218 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:39,250 spiritual entities are composed of 219 00:10:45,330 --> 00:10:42,490 closed strings and we can pop in and out 220 00:10:49,230 --> 00:10:45,340 of this universe when we're not tied to 221 00:10:51,570 --> 00:10:49,240 a body string theory is consistent with 222 00:10:53,610 --> 00:10:51,580 this picture if you don't like string 223 00:10:56,790 --> 00:10:53,620 theory you can at least think of it as a 224 00:11:00,600 --> 00:10:56,800 way to conceive of these things as 225 00:11:04,569 --> 00:11:00,610 having some kind of physical basis if 226 00:11:10,259 --> 00:11:04,579 you reject that you reject my talk 227 00:11:12,819 --> 00:11:10,269 which is okay but why would I think this 228 00:11:14,739 --> 00:11:12,829 well it turns out of that empirical 229 00:11:17,289 --> 00:11:14,749 evidence from the near-death experience 230 00:11:21,220 --> 00:11:17,299 and this is where another connection 231 00:11:24,419 --> 00:11:21,230 comes in Indi ears are people who have 232 00:11:27,699 --> 00:11:24,429 experienced near-death experiences so 233 00:11:30,669 --> 00:11:27,709 from Raymond Moody's initial book in 234 00:11:33,009 --> 00:11:30,679 1975 which is rich with descriptions is 235 00:11:36,669 --> 00:11:33,019 short on science but it's rich in 236 00:11:39,429 --> 00:11:36,679 descriptions he quotes people who were 237 00:11:42,369 --> 00:11:39,439 out of their bodies and he asked them 238 00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:42,379 what they were like what their cells 239 00:11:46,539 --> 00:11:43,730 were like when they were out of their 240 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:46,549 bodies and here are three quotes first 241 00:11:53,530 --> 00:11:49,850 the person described being composed of 242 00:11:57,009 --> 00:11:53,540 waves and being charged a second person 243 00:11:59,619 --> 00:11:57,019 described being an energy pattern and a 244 00:12:02,710 --> 00:11:59,629 third person described to being a little 245 00:12:04,949 --> 00:12:02,720 ball of energy and if you'll think back 246 00:12:07,179 --> 00:12:04,959 to the closet picture I had just before 247 00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:07,189 doesn't that seem like a little ball of 248 00:12:13,900 --> 00:12:10,730 energy just on the surface of it this 249 00:12:17,859 --> 00:12:13,910 gives me the idea that in fact the human 250 00:12:20,650 --> 00:12:17,869 spirit is has an energetic nature or 251 00:12:22,299 --> 00:12:20,660 energetic basis and it's composed of 252 00:12:25,479 --> 00:12:22,309 something that's not tied to this 253 00:12:27,609 --> 00:12:25,489 universe other than by interactions with 254 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:27,619 the body so when you're out of your body 255 00:12:42,710 --> 00:12:40,730 you might go through a wormhole this is 256 00:12:44,509 --> 00:12:42,720 the relativistic wormhole predicted by 257 00:12:47,180 --> 00:12:44,519 general relativity it's one of the 258 00:12:48,530 --> 00:12:47,190 solutions to Einstein's equations one of 259 00:12:54,889 --> 00:12:48,540 the many solutions along with black 260 00:13:00,019 --> 00:12:54,899 holes and it suggests that we can find 261 00:13:02,689 --> 00:13:00,029 my red dot I'm gonna do it without it 262 00:13:05,509 --> 00:13:02,699 suggests that we can traverse from one 263 00:13:08,179 --> 00:13:05,519 area of space to another but relatively 264 00:13:10,579 --> 00:13:08,189 relativity explicitly says that the 265 00:13:13,100 --> 00:13:10,589 topology of the two surfaces connected 266 00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:13,110 are not determined by the presence of 267 00:13:16,999 --> 00:13:15,569 the wormhole so those two surfaces can 268 00:13:19,129 --> 00:13:17,009 wrap around and connect with each other 269 00:13:21,170 --> 00:13:19,139 in which case the wormhole is a shortcut 270 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:21,180 from one place to another in this 271 00:13:26,869 --> 00:13:24,810 universe or the two surfaces can be 272 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:26,879 completely disconnected which means the 273 00:13:31,999 --> 00:13:29,370 wormhole represents a pathway from one 274 00:13:34,369 --> 00:13:32,009 universe to another parallel universe 275 00:13:36,769 --> 00:13:34,379 I'm suggesting that in the near-death 276 00:13:39,769 --> 00:13:36,779 experience this is what happens the 277 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:39,779 second case that the disembodied closed 278 00:13:47,689 --> 00:13:43,050 string entity travels through a wormhole 279 00:13:50,030 --> 00:13:47,699 the NDE tunnel as it's called to another 280 00:13:53,120 --> 00:13:50,040 parallel space-time which has been 281 00:13:58,069 --> 00:13:53,130 described in great detail by many in the 282 00:14:01,910 --> 00:13:58,079 years in fact the tunnel itself has been 283 00:14:03,650 --> 00:14:01,920 described here's one description I do 284 00:14:05,870 --> 00:14:03,660 remember thinking to myself that I was 285 00:14:06,590 --> 00:14:05,880 dying and I felt I was floating through 286 00:14:09,050 --> 00:14:06,600 a tunnel 287 00:14:10,939 --> 00:14:09,060 when I say tunnel the only thing I can 288 00:14:13,490 --> 00:14:10,949 think of is you know those sewer pipes 289 00:14:16,370 --> 00:14:13,500 those big pipes they put in it was round 290 00:14:18,559 --> 00:14:16,380 like that but it was enormous I really 291 00:14:22,299 --> 00:14:18,569 couldn't see the edges of it I got the 292 00:14:24,290 --> 00:14:22,309 feeling that it was around another case 293 00:14:26,900 --> 00:14:24,300 the first thing I remember was a 294 00:14:28,970 --> 00:14:26,910 tremendous rushing sound a tremendous 295 00:14:30,889 --> 00:14:28,980 it's very hard to find the right words 296 00:14:33,290 --> 00:14:30,899 to describe the closest thing I could 297 00:14:35,389 --> 00:14:33,300 possibly associated with it with is 298 00:14:37,850 --> 00:14:35,399 possibly the sound of a tornado a 299 00:14:40,879 --> 00:14:37,860 tremendous gushing wind but almost 300 00:14:42,740 --> 00:14:40,889 pulling me and here's the key part and I 301 00:14:46,069 --> 00:14:42,750 was being pulled into a narrow point 302 00:14:49,890 --> 00:14:46,079 from a wide area think again of the 303 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:49,900 wormhole diagram the interviewer says so 304 00:14:56,010 --> 00:14:53,170 going into a funnel and the in in the 305 00:14:56,850 --> 00:14:56,020 ear says yes yes and it was nothing 306 00:14:58,260 --> 00:14:56,860 painful 307 00:15:00,090 --> 00:14:58,270 there was nothing frightening about it 308 00:15:03,570 --> 00:15:00,100 it was just something I felt I gave 309 00:15:08,850 --> 00:15:03,580 myself into and completely and it felt 310 00:15:10,500 --> 00:15:08,860 good a third case I felt as though I was 311 00:15:12,900 --> 00:15:10,510 well that's the hard part to explain 312 00:15:16,230 --> 00:15:12,910 like you're floating like you're there 313 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:16,240 and believe it or not the color is there 314 00:15:21,060 --> 00:15:19,210 is no color it's like a darkness the 315 00:15:23,370 --> 00:15:21,070 interviewer asked did the darkness have 316 00:15:25,770 --> 00:15:23,380 a shape of any kind it was empty 317 00:15:28,050 --> 00:15:25,780 which is not answering the question yeah 318 00:15:30,570 --> 00:15:28,060 that's it's space just nothing nothing 319 00:15:33,780 --> 00:15:30,580 but something it's like trying to 320 00:15:36,870 --> 00:15:33,790 describe the end of the universe there's 321 00:15:40,200 --> 00:15:36,880 the key phrase so think back to the 322 00:15:43,290 --> 00:15:40,210 diagram of the wormhole would entering 323 00:15:46,910 --> 00:15:43,300 the wormhole be like leaving the 324 00:15:52,680 --> 00:15:46,920 universe that's exactly what it would be 325 00:15:55,050 --> 00:15:52,690 so these in the ear descriptions are 326 00:15:57,690 --> 00:15:55,060 commensurate with a closed string 327 00:16:01,430 --> 00:15:57,700 energetic body that travels through a 328 00:16:05,820 --> 00:16:05,400 outrageous stuff I know but here's the 329 00:16:09,210 --> 00:16:05,830 point 330 00:16:13,590 --> 00:16:09,220 if closed loop strings are composed of 331 00:16:16,890 --> 00:16:13,600 energy then they are constantly leading 332 00:16:20,010 --> 00:16:16,900 this universe through wormholes others 333 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:20,020 I'm proposing are constantly entering 334 00:16:25,230 --> 00:16:22,570 this universe through wormholes that's 335 00:16:29,130 --> 00:16:25,240 how we come and go from this plane of 336 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:29,140 existence furthermore string theory in 337 00:16:33,630 --> 00:16:31,450 general M theory the most advanced form 338 00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:33,640 of it says that there are 11 total 339 00:16:40,350 --> 00:16:36,730 dimensions five of which are 340 00:16:43,230 --> 00:16:40,360 spatiotemporal for spatial dimensions 341 00:16:45,000 --> 00:16:43,240 and one temporal dimension and the 342 00:16:49,500 --> 00:16:45,010 remaining dimensions are curled up and 343 00:16:51,480 --> 00:16:49,510 inaccessible to us in that case screen 344 00:16:53,640 --> 00:16:51,490 theory and relativity are making the 345 00:16:57,330 --> 00:16:53,650 same prediction that there is a fifth 346 00:17:02,730 --> 00:16:57,340 spatial extended spatial dimension that 347 00:17:05,870 --> 00:17:02,740 means that not only are we losing energy 348 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:05,880 and gaining energy by exchange through 349 00:17:12,210 --> 00:17:09,850 wormholes but other energy in the form 350 00:17:14,059 --> 00:17:12,220 of gravitons is leaving the universe 351 00:17:17,210 --> 00:17:14,069 through the other curled up dimensions 352 00:17:20,970 --> 00:17:17,220 in other words energy is not conserved 353 00:17:23,970 --> 00:17:20,980 it's constantly leaking out of and into 354 00:17:26,850 --> 00:17:23,980 this universe and so let me go to my 355 00:17:28,830 --> 00:17:26,860 summary points energy leaks from this 356 00:17:31,169 --> 00:17:28,840 universe in the form of gravitons not 357 00:17:33,270 --> 00:17:31,179 bound by our space-time energy is 358 00:17:35,340 --> 00:17:33,280 exchanged between this and a parallel 359 00:17:36,990 --> 00:17:35,350 space-time in the form of closed string 360 00:17:39,930 --> 00:17:37,000 bodies that are the seat of 361 00:17:42,150 --> 00:17:39,940 consciousness that's from the NDE our 362 00:17:44,700 --> 00:17:42,160 space-time therefore does not constitute 363 00:17:47,340 --> 00:17:44,710 a closed system in the thermodynamic 364 00:17:49,430 --> 00:17:47,350 sense we can no longer say the universe 365 00:17:51,890 --> 00:17:49,440 is a closed system and save the 366 00:17:56,970 --> 00:17:51,900 conservation of energy through that 367 00:17:59,340 --> 00:17:56,980 mechanism further conservation of energy 368 00:18:02,850 --> 00:17:59,350 therefore cannot apply to the US as a 369 00:18:05,340 --> 00:18:02,860 whole nor to consciousness at all and 370 00:18:07,350 --> 00:18:05,350 please note that conservation of energy 371 00:18:11,669 --> 00:18:07,360 historically has been one of the 372 00:18:15,030 --> 00:18:11,679 objections to substance dualism as an 373 00:18:17,430 --> 00:18:15,040 explanation of mind body nature or 374 00:18:18,049 --> 00:18:17,440 interaction so this destroys that 375 00:18:20,490 --> 00:18:18,059 objection 376 00:18:22,910 --> 00:18:20,500 similarly conservation of energy cannot 377 00:18:26,250 --> 00:18:22,920 be applied to large mass systems 378 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:26,260 although this has not been tested and 379 00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:30,010 remember fineman's statement the natural 380 00:18:34,710 --> 00:18:32,050 phenomena that we are aware of to date 381 00:18:35,880 --> 00:18:34,720 well now we know more than we did when 382 00:18:38,430 --> 00:18:35,890 Feynman was alive 383 00:18:41,220 --> 00:18:38,440 hence conservation of energy should be 384 00:18:43,650 --> 00:18:41,230 seen as a useful approximation but only 385 00:18:45,630 --> 00:18:43,660 for small mass systems and inanimate 386 00:18:47,820 --> 00:18:45,640 systems that is systems without 387 00:18:50,400 --> 00:18:47,830 consciousness because I believe the 388 00:18:53,190 --> 00:18:50,410 consciousness has its origins in closed 389 00:18:54,830 --> 00:18:53,200 strings that are not necessarily 390 00:18:58,260 --> 00:18:54,840 conserved in the universe 391 00:19:02,659 --> 00:18:58,270 so that's my talk thank you very much 392 00:19:06,180 --> 00:19:02,669 [Applause] 393 00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:06,190 I've spent a lot of time analyzing UFO 394 00:19:12,830 --> 00:19:09,850 data including pictures of orbs just one 395 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:12,840 thing sprang to mind whenever you see a 396 00:19:18,149 --> 00:19:15,490 fuzzy faint orb 397 00:19:20,909 --> 00:19:18,159 look diametrically opposed in the 398 00:19:23,490 --> 00:19:20,919 photograph for a bright light sometimes 399 00:19:26,100 --> 00:19:23,500 there's a lens reflection that goes over 400 00:19:28,980 --> 00:19:26,110 to the opposite side and sure enough in 401 00:19:30,659 --> 00:19:28,990 this photograph of the closet down in 402 00:19:33,810 --> 00:19:30,669 the lower left was the brightest thing 403 00:19:35,629 --> 00:19:33,820 in the Laura left was a bright light the 404 00:19:37,769 --> 00:19:35,639 brightest thing in the frame and 405 00:19:45,180 --> 00:19:37,779 diametrically opposed was a dim light 406 00:19:49,080 --> 00:19:45,190 maybe just pointed on my question 407 00:19:51,870 --> 00:19:49,090 involves detection it's so if mass is 408 00:19:53,909 --> 00:19:51,880 not consider G is not conserved then 409 00:19:56,460 --> 00:19:53,919 perhaps mass also is not conserved and 410 00:19:58,950 --> 00:19:56,470 then there's a mass associated with any 411 00:20:02,220 --> 00:19:58,960 energy divided by C squared and all that 412 00:20:03,450 --> 00:20:02,230 so just as we can build detectors and 413 00:20:07,590 --> 00:20:03,460 people have built detectors to detect 414 00:20:09,659 --> 00:20:07,600 the standard spin to gravity waves it 415 00:20:13,169 --> 00:20:09,669 ought to be possible I suppose to build 416 00:20:14,639 --> 00:20:13,179 a detector that could detect these what 417 00:20:18,090 --> 00:20:14,649 would you call it scalar gravity wave 418 00:20:27,510 --> 00:20:18,100 that would occur when a mass suddenly 419 00:20:39,620 --> 00:20:31,050 I can't comment on that productively at 420 00:20:42,390 --> 00:20:39,630 all sorry yes I'd like to comment that 421 00:20:44,160 --> 00:20:42,400 you're actually not refuting energy 422 00:20:46,320 --> 00:20:44,170 conservation at all you're simply 423 00:20:48,530 --> 00:20:46,330 extending the size of the system that we 424 00:20:51,900 --> 00:20:48,540 have to refer to as the whole universe I 425 00:20:53,940 --> 00:20:51,910 do have an issue with the whole going 426 00:20:56,070 --> 00:20:53,950 through a wormhole notion however 427 00:20:58,380 --> 00:20:56,080 because there's there's nothing magical 428 00:21:02,220 --> 00:20:58,390 about a relativistic wormhole that would 429 00:21:07,650 --> 00:21:02,230 make it only accessible to closed 430 00:21:10,470 --> 00:21:07,660 strings if there were one or many large 431 00:21:13,940 --> 00:21:10,480 wormholes in the vicinity of Earth we we 432 00:21:15,990 --> 00:21:13,950 would definitely have noticed by now I 433 00:21:19,110 --> 00:21:16,000 happen to disagree with you very 434 00:21:22,770 --> 00:21:19,120 strongly on that point I'd like to add 435 00:21:25,680 --> 00:21:22,780 to what the first questionnaire said 436 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:25,690 which is describing a lens flare but 437 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:28,450 there is another mechanism where you can 438 00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:31,930 produce another mechanism where you can 439 00:21:41,160 --> 00:21:38,010 produce these orbs okay there's another 440 00:21:45,090 --> 00:21:41,170 mechanism okay there's another mechanism 441 00:21:47,490 --> 00:21:45,100 where you can produce orbs I in my 442 00:21:50,370 --> 00:21:47,500 research I track a phenomena called 443 00:21:52,740 --> 00:21:50,380 earth lights which often precede large 444 00:21:55,350 --> 00:21:52,750 earthquakes and so I've done a lot of 445 00:21:59,250 --> 00:21:55,360 photo analysis and debunking my own 446 00:22:03,090 --> 00:21:59,260 material a lot of it but what can happen 447 00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:03,100 is that dust that's about eighteen 448 00:22:09,860 --> 00:22:05,770 inches in front of the cameras lens can 449 00:22:13,680 --> 00:22:09,870 reflect the flash from the camera and 450 00:22:18,780 --> 00:22:13,690 dust is everywhere and oftentimes we see 451 00:22:22,460 --> 00:22:18,790 a person with a beard that is surrounded 452 00:22:26,070 --> 00:22:22,470 by orbs and or wearing fuzzy clothes and 453 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:26,080 so what happens is I think that you have 454 00:22:32,580 --> 00:22:28,330 to be very careful in the interpretation 455 00:22:35,340 --> 00:22:32,590 of the of an orb and really do a very 456 00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:35,350 concentrated analysis and rule out 457 00:22:39,810 --> 00:22:38,050 because I've taken a dust cloth and 458 00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:39,820 shaking it in front of a camera I've 459 00:22:43,790 --> 00:22:41,250 taken 460 00:22:46,370 --> 00:22:43,800 you know spray and you can produce these 461 00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:46,380 orbs so I suggest that maybe you do that 462 00:22:53,900 --> 00:22:47,970 and compare that to some of your 463 00:22:56,780 --> 00:22:53,910 photographs thank you very much for your 464 00:23:00,500 --> 00:22:56,790 talk it really meant a lot to me I just 465 00:23:02,420 --> 00:23:00,510 like to say about orbs that from being 466 00:23:05,180 --> 00:23:02,430 very skeptical 467 00:23:09,770 --> 00:23:05,190 I was completely turned around on going 468 00:23:13,700 --> 00:23:09,780 to the festival of sacred music in Fez 469 00:23:16,850 --> 00:23:13,710 Morocco and on looking at my photographs 470 00:23:21,470 --> 00:23:16,860 when I got home flash photographs in a 471 00:23:24,320 --> 00:23:21,480 huge auditorium open-air the it was 472 00:23:27,470 --> 00:23:24,330 loaded with orbs and many of them were 473 00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:27,480 colored now since then I've done a lot 474 00:23:36,980 --> 00:23:31,850 of control experiments and there was 475 00:23:37,700 --> 00:23:36,990 spray water spray and fungal spores and 476 00:23:41,570 --> 00:23:37,710 things like that 477 00:23:44,210 --> 00:23:41,580 they're never colored and the other 478 00:23:48,590 --> 00:23:44,220 example I quote I went around local 479 00:23:50,510 --> 00:23:48,600 church yards at night in the oldest one 480 00:23:52,490 --> 00:23:50,520 the old Saxon churchyard 481 00:24:00,400 --> 00:23:52,500 the orbs were there and they were 482 00:24:03,710 --> 00:24:00,410 colored I had a question why you used 483 00:24:06,560 --> 00:24:03,720 gravitons to be the source of this 484 00:24:09,100 --> 00:24:06,570 energy leakage it's it's sort of an 485 00:24:15,890 --> 00:24:09,110 imaginary particle no-one's even found 486 00:24:18,440 --> 00:24:15,900 why you do you choose that well string 487 00:24:22,460 --> 00:24:18,450 theorists who chose it and yes they have 488 00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:22,470 not been found yet but about three years 489 00:24:27,860 --> 00:24:24,210 ago the Higgs boson had never been found 490 00:24:31,760 --> 00:24:27,870 and now it has been so I guess I'm 491 00:24:33,080 --> 00:24:31,770 relying on future physics to come to a 492 00:24:35,300 --> 00:24:33,090 conclusion that these things are real